~craftyguy/superd#42: 
Feature: superctl is-active command

Systemctl has an is-active subcommand which is useful in scripts that need to check the status of a service

From the systemctl docs:

Check whether any of the specified units are active (i.e. running). Returns an exit code 0 if at least one is active, or non-zero otherwise. Unless --quiet is specified, this will also print the current unit state to standard output.

Status
REPORTED
Submitter
~aren
Assigned to
No-one
Submitted
1 year, 11 months ago
Updated
1 year, 11 months ago
Labels
No labels applied.

~craftyguy 1 year, 11 months ago

On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 18:41:53 +0000 "~aren" outgoing@sr.ht wrote:

Systemctl has an is-active subcommand which is useful in scripts that need to check the status of a service

I think this would be really helpful, thanks for the suggestion!

From the systemctl docs:

Check whether any of the specified units are active (i.e. running). Returns an exit code 0 if at least one is active, or non-zero otherwise. Unless --quiet is specified, this will also print the current unit state to standard output.

If I understand that correctly, it should do something like this?

$ superctl is-active foo
stopped
$ echo $?
1
$ superctl start foo
$ superctl is-active --quiet foo
$ echo $?
0

~aren 1 year, 11 months ago

Correct

I'm not sure if it makes any difference but it looks like systemd prints "inactive" instead of stopped, and returns 3. There's an exit status table in the man page that describes it, if it is useful to match those.

Register here or Log in to comment, or comment via email.