~emersion/soju#72: 
message-ids support

See https://ircv3.net/specs/extensions/message-ids

Not yet clear what the best way to do it is.

  • Stateful IDs, with an entry per message in the database?
  • Stateless IDs, which directly reference the message location in the logs (e.g. filename + byte offset)

How should we handle message-ids coming from upstream servers?

Status
REPORTED
Submitter
~emersion
Assigned to
No-one
Submitted
4 months ago
Updated
2 months ago
Labels
enhancement

~emersion referenced this from #12 4 months ago

~emersion 2 months ago

I believe we need upstream support before downstream support, and we need to keep original message IDs.

Register here or Log in to comment, or comment via email.