@gotmax:matrix.org | Fedora developer. Ansible Community Steering Committee member. Pythonista.
Most of my projects have their own mailing list for patches and discussion. Use https://lists.sr.ht/~gotmax23/public-inbox for those that don't.
Comment by ~gotmax23 on ~gotmax23/fedrq
Maxwell G referenced this ticket in commit 0ba54ae.
REPORTED
RESOLVED FIXEDComment by ~gotmax23 on ~gotmax23/fedrq
This is too much of a breaking change, but we can consider warning in the case of ambiguities.
2: low-priority added by ~gotmax23 on ~gotmax23/fedrq
~gotmax23 assigned ~gotmax23 to #42 on ~gotmax23/fedrq
Ticket created by ~gotmax23 on ~gotmax23/fedrq
While fedrq isn't really meant for this purpose (it focuses on querying remote repos based on the value of --branch), we should allow querying the @system repo directly through the CLI. This is already supported through the lower-level fedrq APIs, but not the CLI or higher-level APIs is in the config module.
Ticket created by ~gotmax23 on ~gotmax23/fedrq
At least for libdnf5, BaseMaker is the only code that does not involve monkeypatching. It'd be nice to split each backend's implementation into a separate module so it can be accessed without affecting global state.
- backends
- base_maker
- base
- dnf
- libdnf5
- base
- dnf/libdnf5
__init__.py
with function to get BaseMaker impl- backend
__init__.py
with re-exported BaseMaker