Comment by ~kaushalmodi on ~sircmpwn/man.sr.ht
Understood. Thank you for considering this.
Comment by ~kaushalmodi on ~sircmpwn/man.sr.ht
If using static binaries is an option, Pandoc provides those. But I understand that that wouldn't be efficient.
Comment by ~kaushalmodi on ~sircmpwn/man.sr.ht
There isn't one that I know of that would 100% support the Org mode spec. Coincidentally, a discussion is going on here.
Comment by ~kaushalmodi on ~sircmpwn/todo.sr.ht
Thank you. I got confused by the URL structure (given that base URL is also todo.sr.ht). I got the structure now.
Re-posted at https://todo.sr.ht/%7Esircmpwn/man.sr.ht/13 [mentioning it here to just close the loop].
Ticket created by ~kaushalmodi on ~sircmpwn/man.sr.ht
Hello,
I have heavily used both Markdown and Org mode. And I have grown to prefer Org mode over the other because of better (subjective, of course) syntax, etc.
Org mode is supported by Pandoc and even the rendered on GitHub/Gitlab.
[If this is possible, I would write manuals and wikis for my repos directly in Org mode.]
Is this something you would consider supporting?
Thanks!
Comment by ~kaushalmodi on ~sircmpwn/todo.sr.ht
.. so that I can write my repo manuals/wikis in Org mode. In which tracker should I put that request?
Comment by ~kaushalmodi on ~sircmpwn/todo.sr.ht
Sorry, I was actually looking for the bug tracker for https://man.sr.ht/, but couldn't find it.
Ticket created by ~kaushalmodi on ~sircmpwn/todo.sr.ht
Hello,
I have heavily used both Markdown and Org mode. And I have grown to prefer Org mode over the other because of better (subjective, of course) syntax, etc.
Org mode is supported by Pandoc and even the rendered on GitHub/Gitlab.
Is this something you would consider supporting?
Thanks!