~sircmpwn/meta.sr.ht#29: 
Add user groups and access groups

Status
REPORTED
Submitter
~sircmpwn
Assigned to
No-one
Submitted
6 years ago
Updated
11 months ago
Labels
beta

~sircmpwn 6 years ago

Spec:

There are two kinds of user groups: organizations and groups.

Organizations behave like users and have the % prefix. They can own repositories and live in a global namespace.

Groups are a group of users and/or organizations and have the ^ prefix. They can be assigned to ACL entries and live in a private namespace, under a single user/group.

This allows you to, for example, establish an organization for a larger project, like %swaywm, and fill it with groups of users with different permissions. These can be referred to like %swaywm^committers, %swaywm^triage, %swaywm^subproject, etc. These can be filled with different sets of other users and ACLs configured appropriately, such as giving %swaywm^committers push access and letting %swaywm^triage some extra permissions on the bug tracker.

You can also establish groups underneath a user, like ~sircmpwn^friends. You can refer to such groups with the ^friends shorthand, your username is implied. These can be used to make combined profile pages, such as git.sr.ht/^friends, and used in ACLs just like groups underneath an org.

~z3ntu 5 years ago

Organizations would be really handy for lists and git.

~justinkelly 5 years ago

+1 for Organisations, very important for multi developer open source projects. So the project doesn't appear to be 'owned' by a single developer.

~auc 4 years ago

In the context of the bitbucket-mercurial exodus, allow me to note that indeed, organizations would be very welcome. Is there a chance to see this before the complete shutdown ? It would help avoid relocating to temporary uris.

~voltagex 4 years ago

This could be handy for grouping sets of projects, by language or topic under a user account.

~xvilka 4 years ago

Apart from that, it would be nice to have the ability to transfer the project from the user to an organization out of the box, so the migration from the existing repositories will be easier.

~bmeneg 3 years ago

Is there an ETA for this feature getting public (beta-testers maybe)?

~boehs 2 years ago

I imagine sourcehut would also end up under an organization?

How will pricing work? Will organizations be subject to the same pricing model as users?

~boehs 2 years ago*

Prefix nonos

  • % is probably a bad idea because browsers assign special meaning to it (%20)
  • ^ is probably a bad for zsh reasons

On the mailing list0 I believe you narrowed it down to .-_~!&*+=

I like & ;)

~xvilka 11 months ago

Have there been any updates on this issue?

Register here or Log in to comment, or comment via email.