Currently they just display as "webmention"
I would like to get some feedback, if we can detect the right microformat, do you think they should be merged with the ActivityPub likes/shares? I think that would make sense.
For replies, displaying them merged with ActivityPub replies would require a bit more work, so we might want to keep them merged with the "unknown" webmentions like it is right now (at least for now, I can give this a try too when I have some time).
And I would also like to get more context, if I understand correctly, you're using bridgy-fed to cross post to Twitter, is that correct?
I think displaying things merged with their activitypub equivalents makes sense. I'm happy to have a go at making replies work once I've seen how you want to handle doing it for reposts and likes.
Also need to make sure we're checking permalinks to avoid duplication from sources that do both activity pub and microformats enabled webmentions
Not using bridgy to cross-post, doing that by hand at the moment, but bridgy is feeding me webmentions for likes and reposts etc on twitter